But I know that this statement must have originated from one who was either woefully ignorant of Baugh's work, or one wishing to use deceit for the sake of discrediting the recent finds which have gained considerable publicity.
Even the work done years ago near Glen Rose had uncovered human tracks beneath in situ formations. Even though certain individuals did carve out tracks to sell, it is absurd to claim that all human tracks found in the Paluxy were carved. That would be like saying that beeause the Piltdown jaw was a forgery, all other fossil jaws ever found were also deliberate fakes.
Fossil Footprints Show Humans Hunting a Giant Sloth - The Atlantic
Indeed, if the tracks at the Baugh site were carved, then it must have been dinosaurs that carved them!! In my opinion, then, the only honest escape that could be made from the results of Baugh's work would be the argument that the impressions being reported as human tracks were not really that, but instead the result of wishful thinking Earlier analyses of tracks found in the river bed have been considered such things, and still concluded that some of the tracks were of human origin. But what of the Baugh tracks? Did they exist only in the minds of excavators?
Fossil Footprints
Others had observed the tracks, and likely their conelusions will become available to the public. But still I was not satisfied to take someone else's word for it. I wanted to see them myself, and make up my own mind. Well, I did get to see them for myself- not only tracks which had been found months before, but also new ones which were found while I was there I have come to the conclusion that they are genuine My reasons are as follows: First, it is widely accepted that the Paluxy River exhibits many dinosaur prints a nearby area was made a state park for that very reason.
So there seems to be no contention over the dinosaur prints; the dispute is over the human tracks. However, I am one who knows that fossil finds have shown that larger animals of many types have lived in the past - considerably larger than their modern descendants. Also, the skeleton of a woman 7 feet tall was found in a cave less than 20 miles from the footprint location. In excavated tracks personally I found that there were definite impressions that followed consistent patterns, and with consistent dimensions.
These were further identified by "up-push" ridging around their perimeters. And nd with the shape and proportions of human feet, there were toe impressions.
- The Paluxy Dinosaur/"Man Track" Controversy?
- tracy chappelow cincinnati ohio white pages.
- Ancient footprints in Crete challenge theory of human evolution – but what actually made them?!
- One of World's Finest Dinosaur Footprint Discoveries Uncovered in NASA's Parking Lot!
While there were some spurious patterns most notieeable being the fossilized worm burrows , I considered the chances of spurious marks lining up in rows of one big, and four small toes, at the proper ends of the elongated depressions, and in the right, left, right I decided that the chances of spurious marks just happening to fit these patterning were nil.
And I would like to describe in detail the discovery of the last human print I found at site A on Friday, August Two days earlier two human prints were found in stride. Then on Thursday a new area was opened - one that was a high priority, since deep prints has been found next to it. But little was found there.
Main navigation
I heard Dr. Baugh working on my right say that he found a depression which he speculated was a dinosaur track. But rather than take the time to clean out a dinosaur print of which many had already been found there , we moved ahead to search for human prints. On Friday morning, before the others came to resume work on the next sections, I looked over the site again. The print passed over as a dinosaur print was elongated, and it fit in with the stride pattern of the two prints found on Wednesday - and also with prints found months before. Stooping down to study the details of this print, I found definite toe impressions in it, and its length was the same 16" as the others.
The point is that the recognition that this was a human print came as a surprise to everyone. So it could not possibly be attributed to anticipation - as though an excavator meagured out to where he thought the next track should be, then interpreted spurious marks he found there to be a footprint. As a matter of fact, for the tracks that I excavated it so happened that the compacted clay in the layer on top of the print layer lifted off in horizontal slabs, under which were seen the footprint characteristics - even before detail work was done to clean out the toes, etc.
After having studied somewhat of the history of science, and having some direct expenence with the reaction of the "scientific community" to discoveries which challenge the current dogma of science, I can only predict that the recent discoveries at the Baugh site will be scorned, ridiculed, and ignored by the scientific authorities. Only a few open-minded individuals will give this evidence fair consideration.
Choose country
Whether any of those might attempt to re-work the geologic timetable so as to reconcile it with the coexistence of men and dinosaurs - this remains to be seen. I doubt that any major revision to the geologic ages will be acknowledged by the majority of present-day scientists, because such an acknowledgement would only enhance the credibility problem which evolution already has in the public's eye. I would have to say that the belief in evolution is in a state of terminal illness.
But its death will only be admitted by a new generation of scientists whose minds have not been prejudiced by the type of education now prevalent in the nation's public schools - an education which starts with the belief that evolution has happened, which interprets all evidence according to that faith, and which simply discards any evidence which cannot be fitted into the evolutionary framework.
Hilton Hinderliter, PhD. Apollo Campus Penn State University. The excavations progressed slowly, deliberately, and with increasing professionalism. We were developing an excavation technique using hydraulic equipment and soft wooden instruments untried by both archaeology and paleontology. The procedure and analysis included both areas of scientific discipline in its methodology, and it actually blended the fossil record paleontology with evidence of human occupation archaeology. Increasingly, the evidence focused on paleoanthropology - the fossil evidence of ancient man.
Only, this evidence was not so ancient! Yet this evidence of human presence was found in context normally interpreted to be extremely ancient - involving philosophic interpretations of life origins.
Press reports and speaking appointments attracted interest from international quarters. Hugh Miller31 of Columbus, Ohio even sent a supporting letter to the Vatican. Hugh is a professional chemist formerly on the scientific staff of the prestigious Battelle Institute of Columbus, Ohio.
This was the scientific research center chosen to analyze the moonstones brought back by Apollo 11 crewman. Hugh decided that he wanted to personally verify our bold claims. He and a small group from Columbus arrived on a hot Texas summer day in July The delicate frame of this scientific investigator from Columbus was soon laboriously involved in assisting us in the removal of a large slab of limestone overburden. We fondly referred to this particular slab as the "coffin stone", since it measured six feet long, two and a half feet wide, and a foot thick.
On the second day of excavation Hugh was rewarded for his interest and long days of travel to Glen Rose. All five toes, including the dominant big toe and the weaker second toe, were intact and in their appropriate placement. Seepage water was slowly accumulating, so we tried to dig a trench around the footprint in the limestone host rock. At the time of fresh excavation the stone was so hard we could not dig a small trench with a geology pick!
By the weekend geo-physicist John DeVilbis, Ph. He photographed the fossil print in situ in color, black and white, and stereo. We named the inch series of human footprints six such prints were excavated altogether the "Sir George series" after the late Governor General of the Fiji Islands. A plaster of paris cast of the print was sent to Dr. A year passed quickly. After he viewed the evidences first-hand and excavated a very good 16 inch footprint with the team, an article by Michele Prince reported: "Baugh and Hall excavated a human footprint with the big toe and smaller toes in their descending angle and the arched instep, scientifically peculiar to the human species There is definite evidence that man and dinosaurs co-existed The fact that these tracks were so clearly preserved in this porous substance indicated rapid burial - again, the Flood.
Monday, August 6, This was just another day in our excavation. However, to one of our workers it was very special, for he was to help excavate and to take a cast of what was clearly a human footprint close to a dinosaur print. George Detweller is a public school teacher, qualified in four areas - these being biology, geology, physics and astronomy - with a Master's degree from Ohio State University.
He was excited when the infill clay was removed and there was a human footprint - as he put it, "this was under that solid foot of limestone". He made a cast of this print. Walter Land of Bible-Science Association documented the entire procedure on videotape. This footprint was on the same ledge on which Dr.
Clifford Wilson had found another footprint two years earlier - we had now removed more of the overlying limestone ledge, and any unbiased observer would have to acknowledge the genuineness of this find. Anybody setting out to fake these things simply could not do so underneath 12 inches of limestone and 4 inches of marl, with the footprint itself set solidly in the hard limestone.
This particular human footprint was 8 feet from the nearest dinosaur footprint we found in the area. Others were only a few inches apart, and in at least one case the human and dinosaur footprint overlapped.