Subscribe to our mailing list and get the latest content delievered to your email! Don't worry, we never send spam!.
Enter your Email address. Related Articles. Facebook Twitter Reddit. This is where the complicated answer comes in. As Mausam highlights, the danger of AI is not that it will become autonomous. The danger is that it will be used by humans, in the menacing way only humans can use something. This is also a danger that Yuval Noah Harari highlights so aptly in his book Homo Deus, in which he argues that few elites will be able to rule over -- and this will not be rule of merciful benefactors -- over masses using AI-assisted machines.
The dangers of AI, argues Harari, is that it completely devalues humans. Or seen from a different context, the immediate danger of AI and smart machines is not that they will make the world more efficient but that they will make it more bureaucratic, more chaotic.
The smart systems will also put more power into the hands of few. One example is India's Aadhaar, that uses advanced biometric recognition system to identify people.
- digitize my old vinyl records.
- Evidence for ongoing human evolution.
- vehicle identification number harley davidson.
- Take the pledge to vote.
But instead of empowering people with an ID, it instead puts its trust in smart machines, which when they fail to identify a person treat that person as non-existent. In future, more of those smart systems will come online. Amazon, for example, is working with the US government on implementing face recognition technologies in various places. The intent is to create systems that will keep an eye on criminals, make society safe. But that is where AI and smart machines falter. In a test recently by American Civil Liberties Union, Amazon's Rekognition falsely matched 28 members of Congress with mugshots of criminals.
Not only that, the people it falsely matched were disproportionately people of colour. Imagine, an airport using smart machines and AI to ID fliers and then imagine that 10 per cent of matches fail.
BBC Earth delivered direct to your inbox
Once AI is everywhere, and is automated probably monitored by a security who has full faith in his machine, imagine the kind of havoc that false-positives may end up creating at an airport, or in a bank, or inside an office complex. Then there is AI, which is expected to break down the reality as we take it for granted. Already, we have seen how much of chaos smart algorithms of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google have generated in the world.
Fake news is rampant. Trolls have a say and a voice. Misinformation is easy to spread. Now imagine even smarter systems coming online, and completely destroying reality.
Some of these are already in testing. Google recently showed its Duplex AI that can make phone calls and talk like humans. After much outcry, Google announced that in future whenever it deploys Duplex, it will ensure that AI identifies itself as a machine. Then there are technologies like Deepfakes in the works.
Deepfakes allows people to create AI-generated videos using voice and footage of real people. Result is that Deepfakes can be used to impersonate people online, it can also be used to sway public opinion. These are the concerns raised by a group of researchers from Cambridge, Oxford and Yale universities in a joint study published earlier this year.
What humans will look like in 100 years' time
So, what's the way out? Machines will get smarter. Algorithms will rule our lives. What can we do about the inequality issues that could arise? Inequality is an interesting one because, as humans, we go for it.
- finding the location of an ip address.
- Future Humans: Four Ways We May, or May Not, Evolve.
- rock island county illinois clerk arrested.
- dollar general federal id number.
- los angeles ca death and certificates.
- blank copy of birth certificate.
- public court records of south dakota.
We can put it in the context of being better, but what does that mean with a lot of technology? Some people have new technology, even the wheel or the fire, and they make use of that, with weapon systems. Us Europeans have been pretty awful in the past using that technology to go and exploit other countries. So my suspicion is we will probably as a society do a lot more of that. We will use the technology, link more closely with it, and allow it create inequalities, we will use that for financial and political gain, rather than try and put a level playing field out there.
But I doubt that will happen, realistically. I think humanity has to be techno-optimist rather than techno pessimist. The techno-pessimist future is very easy.
Evolution Hasn't Stopped: This is what the Human Face Will Look Like in the Future — Curiosmos
You know, when it gets out of hand or ultimately the technology takes over, the Terminator scenario. I would love to see myself as a techno-optimist. We use our own and third-party cookies to offer you a pleasant experience and display to users advertising related with your preferences, based on analysis of your browsing habits. By continuing to browse this website you agree to their use. You can change the cookie settings or obtain further information by accessing our cookies policy.
Click Enter. Login Profile. Es En.
What Will Humans Look Like In The Future? Some Possible Scenarios
Economy Humanities Science Technology. Multimedia OpenMind books Authors. Featured author. William Klepper. Latest book. Towards a New Enlightenment?